Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - King Alfred Leisure Centre Regeneration Project

Brighton and Hove Cabinet Decided 18 Jul 2024 · effective 27 Jul 2024 approved Key decision GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Cabinet
Report author
Mark Healy
Published
19 Jul 2024
Reference
7253

As published

the council's own words, unedited

This report will set out options for delivering a new leisure centre in the west of the city. Cabinet will be asked to consider the site and delivery options.

That Cabinet: 1) Agrees that part of the existing seafront King Alfred site is the preferred site on which to take forward the development of the new sports and leisure facility to replace the existing King Alfred Leisure Centre. 2) Approves the indicative capital budget for the project of up to £47.4 million to be included in the Medium Term Capital Investment programme to be funded from a combination of capital receipts, government grants and council borrowing. 3) Approves an initial allocation of £2.7m of these resources to progress the project to planning application stage funded from council borrowing. 4) Agrees to the commencement of design work for the development of the Leisure Centre on the preferred site, to include procuring the lead architect and professional team to deliver the new facility and delegates authority to the Corporate Director to approve the procurement of the associated professional team and to progress the project to planning application stage. 5) Notes the inclusion of £1.07 million estimated ongoing revenue commitment within the Medium Term Financial Strategy to recognise the potential net financing costs of the project from 2025/26 onwards. 6) Notes that as the project progresses to key decision points further reports will be presented to cabinet in line with the timetable set out at 4.16.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 3428/512 tokens · 5918ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 15:29
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The report examines refurbishing the existing King Alfred Leisure Centre as a baseline reference case. An estimated £13.98 million would be needed for remedial works to keep the facility operating for a further 10 years, but the refurbishment would not provide modern facilities, significantly improve energy efficiency or resolve the building’s fundamental design limitations.

Recommendation
The reference case considered refurbishing the existing facility, involving remedial works including asbestos removal, structural repairs, plant replacement and external works.
Financial impact
Estimated £13.98 million for remedial refurbishment works to extend the facility’s usable life by around 10 years.

Stakeholders named

parsed
Users of the King Alfred Leisure CentreSwimming clubsLocal sports clubsGym and fitness usersFaith groupsSports organisations

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage