Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Targeted Budget Management (TBM) Provisional Outturn 2023/24

Brighton and Hove Cabinet Decided 27 Jun 2024 · effective 6 Jul 2024 approved Key decision GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Cabinet
Report author
Nigel Manvell
Published
28 Jun 2024
Reference
7244

As published

the council's own words, unedited

This report recommends that the outturn position for 2023/24 and the Treasury Management performance are noted. The report recommends approval for carry forwards, the allocation of underspends, variations or reprofiling of capital projects, new capital schemes and new reserves.

Cabinet: 1) Notes that the provisional General Fund outturn position is an underspend of £2.268m and that this represents an improvement of £1.789m compared to the projected and planned resource position at Month 9 and taken into account when setting the 2024/25 budget. 2) Notes the provisional outturn includes an underspend of £0.281m on the NHS managed Section 75 services. 3) Approves General Fund carry forward requests totalling £7.816m as detailed in Appendix 5 and assumed within the provisional outturn. 4) Approves the proposed allocation of additional resources as set out in paragraph 11.1. 5) Notes the provisional outturn for the separate Housing Revenue Account (HRA), which is a break-even position. 6) Notes the provisional outturn position for the ring-fenced Dedicated Schools Grant, which is an underspend of £1.275m. 7) Notes the provisional outturn position on the Capital Programme which is an overspend variance of £1.982m. 8) Approves the capital budget variations and re-profiling requests set out in Appendix 7. 9) Approves the new capital schemes requested in Appendix 8. 10) Approves the creation of the new reserve as set out in paragraph 9.9 and new provision in paragraph 9.10. 11) Notes the Treasury Management end of year review 2023/24 as set out in Appendix 10. 12) Agrees that the allocation of £01.85m resources held for investment in priority services or improvements set out in Section 11 be delegated to the Cabinet Member for Finance & Regeneration in consultation with the Leader of the Council.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1134/589 tokens · 6498ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 15:31
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

Approval is sought to add two capital schemes to the 2024/25 Capital Programme. The schemes provide £140,000 for seafront facilities improvements and approximately £412,290 for childcare expansion capital works.

Recommendation
Approve the addition of the Seafront facilities improvements and Childcare Expansion Capital Grant schemes to the 2024/25 Capital Programme.
Financial impact
£140,000 for seafront facilities improvements, funded from direct revenue funding from the Seafront Services 2023/24 revenue budget; £412,290 shown in the capital expenditure profile for the Childcare Expansion Capital Grant, funded by a one-off grant from the Department for Education. The project cost is also stated as £412,209.

Stakeholders named

parsed
Seafront sports facility usersEarly years providersPrimary school-aged children and their families

Next steps

parsed
  • Add the two schemes to the 2024/25 Capital Programme if approved.
  • Undertake the seafront facilities improvements during 2024/25.
  • Use the childcare expansion grant to provide new early years free entitlement and wraparound places.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage