Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Housing Allocations Policy

Brighton and Hove Cabinet Decided 17 Oct 2024 · effective 26 Oct 2024 approved Key decision GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Cabinet
Report author
Luke Harris
Published
18 Oct 2024
Reference
7309

As published

the council's own words, unedited

This report seeks delegated approval to adopt changes to the Council's Housing Allocations Policy – the policy for determining who has priority for social housing in Brighton & Hove and how it is allocated – following a review policy and a 14-week public consultation.

That Cabinet 1) Agree to adopt the changes set out in this report, in summary: i) Change the 'local residency criteria' from 5 years to 5-out-of-7 years (para 4.1 – 4.3); ii) Remove the 'allocation plan queue divisions' (para 4.4 – 4.6); iii) Award 'reasonable preference' to all households with an accepted homeless duty (para 4.7 - 4.9); iv) Award a 'reasonable preference' where homelessness is 'prevented' or 'relieved' (para 4.10-4.12); v) Support applications from joint social housing tenants (para 4.13-4.14); vi) Amend priority awarded to current or former armed forces personnel (para 4.15 – 4.16); vii) Enable 'direct offers' in exceptional circumstances (para 4.17 – 4.18); viii) Remove priority Band A status for households in temporary accommodation, where the property is being returned to the landlord (para 4.19 – 4.20); ix) Award priority Band A status to 'non-statutory successors' for a 6-month time limited period (para 4.21 - 4.24); and x) Permit households with a 4-bed or more need experiencing statutory overcrowding to bid for Brighton & Hove council properties which are one bedroom short of their need, where this would resolve statutory overcrowding (para 4.25 – 4.33). 2) Note these changes in the Allocations Policy (Appendix 1). 3) Note the timescales for full implementation of the revised Allocations Policy by April 2025 (as set out in para 3.5). 4) Agree commencing further consultation and analysis of the impact of a wider cohort of overcrowded households bidding on properties one bedroom less than their households need, where the result would not meet the criteria of statutory overcrowding (para 4.32).

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 12524/1965 tokens · 14036ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 15:33
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The assessment considers changing the Housing Allocations Policy so households needing four or more bedrooms can bid for and accept three-bedroom properties, provided this does not breach statutory space or room standards. It concludes that the change could reduce overcrowding for larger households but may slightly increase waiting times for households needing three bedrooms, and recommends proceeding with caution.

Recommendation
Proceed with the proposed underbidding policy change with caution, because its benefits for households needing four or more bedrooms are considered proportionate to the likely limited adverse effect on households needing three bedrooms.
Financial impact
None stated
Ward affected
city-wide
Decision maker
Harry Williams, Head of Homelessness & Housing Options
Date in document
21 Aug 2024

Stakeholders named

parsed
Households with a need for 4+ bedroomsHouseholds with a need for 3 bedroomsCurrent and potential applicants for social housingHouseholds waiting on the Housing RegisterSocial landlords with nomination agreementsHouseholds experiencing overcrowding

Next steps

parsed
  • Submit the completed EIA to the EDI Business Partner for review and approval.
  • Attach the approved EIA to the relevant committee report.
  • If the policy proceeds, implement the Housing Allocations Policy change with caution and monitor its impacts.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage