Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Gambling Policy review 2025-2027

Brighton and Hove Licensing Committee (Licensing Act 2003 Functions) Decided 10 Oct 2024 approved GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Licensing Committee (Licensing Act 2003 Functions)
Report author
Alex Evans
Published
10 Oct 2024
Reference
7304

As published

the council's own words, unedited

mandatory review of the gambling policy

16.1 The Regulatory Services Manager introduced the report to the committee. 16.2 Councillor Pickett was informed that: · Premises Licensing was going down year-on-year and online gambling was being reviewed. 16.3 Councillor Guilmant was informed that: · There were no details of what the government was reviewing, however, the gambling commission was looking at the ratio of machines per premisses and the need for risk assessments. 16.4 Councillor Davis was informed that: · The band width of charging rates came into force in 2005. The possibility of future changes would be looked at. 16.5 Councillor Sheard was informed that: · Under section E: Enforcement, that the best practice would be taken from a primary authority, however, there was no primary authority in Brighton and Hove. Best practice was encouraged. 16.6 The Chair invited the committee to vote. Vote 16.7 The committee agreed the recommendations unanimously. 16.8 RESOLVED: 2.1 That members agree to refer the final version of the Statement of Gambling Policy 2025 - 2027 to Full Council for adoption. (Appendix 1) 2.2 That the final Statement of Gambling Policy is presented to Full Council.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 3329/1810 tokens · 13202ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 15:34
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

Siân Berry MP responded to Brighton and Hove City Council’s consultation on its draft Gambling Policy for 2025-27, arguing that gambling-related harm is increasing and that stronger local and national action is needed. She proposed limits on gambling establishments and gaming machines, a ban on outdoor gambling advertising, improved local data collection, and further Government action to reduce exposure to gambling advertising.

Recommendation
Adopt policy measures to reduce gambling harm, including a measurable goal to reduce harm to people experiencing problem gambling; introduce a 'one in one out' rule for gambling establishments and gaming machines; prohibit outdoor gambling advertising; collect and analyse local gambling-harm data; suspend replacement permissions if harm increases; consider using the Sustainable Communities Act to seek a national advertising ban; and press Government to restrict gambling advertising and prohibit gambling-company sponsorship of sports teams.
Financial impact
none stated
Ward affected
city-wide
Date in document
15 Sep 2024

Stakeholders named

parsed
people experiencing problem gamblingchildren and young peoplevulnerable adultsresidents of Brighton and Hovegambling companiesgambling establishmentsBrighton and Hove City CouncilGovernment

Next steps

parsed
  • Brighton and Hove City Council should consider the proposed amendments to its draft Gambling Policy for 2025-27.
  • The council should consider implementing local gambling-harm data collection and analysis.
  • The council should consider using the Sustainable Communities Act to seek a national ban on outdoor gambling advertising.
  • The council should work with Siân Berry MP to press Government for tighter gambling advertising controls and a ban on sports-team sponsorship by gambling companies.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage