Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Licence Fees 2026/27 (Non Licensing Act 2003)

Brighton and Hove Licensing Committee (Non Licensing Act 2003 Functions) Decided 6 Nov 2025 for determination GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Licensing Committee (Non Licensing Act 2003 Functions)
Report author
Alex Evans
Published
6 Nov 2025
Reference
7528

As published

the council's own words, unedited

That the committee approved the following licence fees for 2026/27: Taxi Licence fees - as set out in Appendix 1. Sex Entertainment Venues and Sex Establishments fees – as set out in Appendix 2. Street Trading fees – as set out in Appendix 2. All Gambling Act 2005 fees – as set out in Appendix 2. Body piercing – as set out in Appendix 2. All Animal Activity Licences fees - as set out in Appendix 3

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 893/246 tokens · 3320ms · parsed 8 Sep 2026 11:43
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The document sets out proposed 2026/27 rates for taxi, private hire, vehicle and test licences. Most fees are proposed to increase, while the Route Test Fee remains unchanged.

Recommendation
Approve the proposed 2026/27 taxi licence rates listed in the schedule.
Financial impact
None stated

Stakeholders named

parsed
Taxi driversPrivate hire driversHackney carriage vehicle licence holdersPrivate hire vehicle licence holdersPrivate hire operators

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage