Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - City Plan Consultation

Brighton and Hove Decided 30 Jan 2025 approved GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
—
Report author
—
Published
4 Feb 2025
Reference
7390

As published

the council's own words, unedited

That the Petition be noted.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1220/497 tokens · 4546ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 15:37
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The council received a petition signed by more than 1,250 people asking for changes to the City Plan. The petition called for affordability to reflect local incomes, support for key workers, and development that strengthens belonging and community.

Recommendation
That the petition is noted.
Financial impact
none stated
Ward affected
city-wide
Decision maker
Full Council
Date in document
30 Jan 2025

Stakeholders named

parsed
Brighton & Hove Citizenslocal residentskey workersCity Plan consultees

Next steps

parsed
  • The petition will be debated at the Council meeting in accordance with the agreed protocol.
  • The Lead petitioner will be invited to present the petition.
  • Councillors will debate the petition for 15 minutes before the recommendation is formally put to the vote.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage