Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Targeted Budget Management (TBM) 2026/27 Month 2 (May)

Brighton and Hove Cabinet Decided 16 Jul 2026 approved subject to call in Key decision GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Cabinet
Report author
Haley Woollard
Published
17 Jul 2026
Reference
7653

As published

the council's own words, unedited

This report presents the 2026-27 in-year financial performance to Month 2 (May) for noting by Cabinet and seeks approval for any capital variations, reprofiling, exception measures or new reserves.

1) Cabinet notes the forecast risk position for the General Fund, which indicates a potential forecast overspend risk of £19.882m 2) Cabinet notes the additional risks of £17.131m included in the table at Appendix 2 which are not included in the forecast figure above. 3) Cabinet notes the forecast overspend risk for the separate Housing Revenue Account (HRA), which is an overspend of £0.482m. 4) Cabinet notes the forecast overspend risk for the ring-fenced Dedicated Schools Grant, which is an overspend of £6.643m in year resulting in a cumulative deficit of £8.405m. 5) Cabinet approves a request to MHCLG for additional EFS – which is additional borrowing, repaid by further capital receipts - in 2026/27 of up to£30m, to be drawn down if required and discussed in 3.10 below. 6) Cabinet notes the current RAG rating of the transformation workstreams at Appendix 3. 7) Cabinet notes the Treasury Management update at Appendix 4 8) Cabinet notes the Corporate Debtor position at Appendix 5 9) Cabinet approves the addition of new projects to the capital programme totalling £272k as set out in Appendix 6. 10) Cabinet notes the forecast position on the Capital Programme at Appendix 7 which shows budget variations of £4,283k. 11) Cabinet approves the capital budget variations of £6.672m and reprofiling of £8.328m set out in Appendix 7 and discussed at 3.16.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1108/777 tokens · 8139ms · parsed 8 Sep 2026 11:35
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

Two new capital schemes are proposed for 2026/27. The schemes would refurbish Tarner and Moulsecoomb Family Hubs to accommodate Family Help pods and purchase an electric minibus and charging point for Tudor House.

Recommendation
Approve the Families First Service Transformation scheme costing £214,000 and the Tudor House minibus scheme costing £58,000, both funded through borrowing.
Financial impact
£214,000 for Families First Service Transformation and £58,000 for the Tudor House electric minibus and charging point, both funded through borrowing. The Families First Programme is expected to deliver £2.473 million in savings over the MTFS period, with estimated annual loan servicing costs of £27,000. Tudor House loan repayment is estimated at approximately £10,000 per annum over 7 years.
Ward affected
Tarner and Moulsecoomb

Stakeholders named

parsed
Children and young people with disabilitiesFamilies First ProgrammeFamily HubsTudor House

Next steps

parsed
  • Agree the refurbishment works at Tarner and Moulsecoomb Family Hubs before the planned move to the new structure in September.
  • Purchase the new electric minibus and charging point for Tudor House.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage