Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Academisation of Woodingdean Primary school

Brighton and Hove Decided 10 Jul 2025 approved GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
—
Report author
—
Published
15 Jul 2025
Reference
7467

As published

the council's own words, unedited

Resolved to: This council notes: 1) That Woodingdean Primary School is undergoing a consultation on proposals to join the Eko Trust. 2) There is significant concern about the principle of academisation from staff, parents, carers and the community. 3) Woodingdean has two 'good' Ofsted rated maintained schools which deliver excellent educational outcomes for children. 4) The Eko Trust is in the process of a merger with another Multi Academy Trust – feeding uncertainty into the process and future implications for the school. 5) School governors are a vital asset to our family of schools and help deliver excellent educational opportunities for the children of our city – hence we do not want to see them undermined as is often the case in a Multi Academy Trust. This council resolves to: 1) Request that the Leader of the Council writes to the Co-Chair of governors at Woodingdean Primary to seek to extend the consultation period to the autumn, supporting parent's wishes. 2) Request officers to consider how best to ensure that Woodingdean school governors are fully aware and briefed on the school improvement work undertaken in recent years, and the totality of the LEA offer to schools prior to the next Full Governing Board meeting where feedback from the consultation is to be discussed. 3) Request officers and Cabinet members to listen and respond to feedback from the school and to consider whether bespoke packages of support are available and committing to always innovate and evolve the LEA offer. 4) Request officers to consider how they can seek out schools considering academisation, and to present a robust case to them for remaining with the LEA. 5) Note the Administration's position to explicitly oppose new academisation proposals on principle.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1035/1000 tokens · 7635ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 15:38
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The council considered concerns about Woodingdean Primary School joining Eko Trust, including uncertainty caused by Eko Trust's proposed merger and concerns from staff, parents, carers and the community. The motion sought an extension to the consultation, better briefing for governors, further support for the school and a robust case for schools to remain with the LEA.

Recommendation
Request the Leader of the Council to seek an extension of the consultation period; ask officers to brief Woodingdean Primary School governors on school improvement work and the LEA offer; require officers and Cabinet members to respond to school feedback and consider bespoke support; ask officers to engage with schools considering academisation and make the case for remaining with the LEA; and note the Administration’s opposition in principle to new academisation proposals.
Financial impact
none stated
Ward affected
city-wide
Decision maker
Brighton & Hove City Council
Date in document
10 Jul 2025

Stakeholders named

parsed
Woodingdean Primary School staffparents and carersthe Woodingdean Primary School communityschool governorsBrighton & Hove City Council officersCabinet membersEko Trust

Next steps

parsed
  • The Leader of the Council is requested to write to the Co-Chair of governors at Woodingdean Primary School to seek an extension of the consultation period to the autumn.
  • Officers are requested to ensure that Woodingdean Primary School governors are fully aware of recent school improvement work and the totality of the LEA offer before the next Full Governing Board meeting.
  • Officers and Cabinet members are requested to listen and respond to feedback from the school and consider bespoke support packages.
  • Officers are requested to identify schools considering academisation and present a robust case for remaining with the LEA.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage