Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Local impacts of HMG Green Paper - 'Pathways to Work: Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working'

Brighton and Hove Decided 23 Jun 2025 approved GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
—
Report author
—
Published
25 Jun 2025
Reference
7455

As published

the council's own words, unedited

This Council Notes: 1. Government proposals in the 'Pathways to Work' Green Paper 2029-30, would reform the welfare system in a number of ways: increasing the Universal Credit standard rate and the value of disability benefits for those considered most disabled; scrapping the Work Capability Assessment; introducing the 'right to try' and reforming the disability benefit assessment; narrowing the eligibility criteria to Personal Independence Payments (PIP), and reducing health-condition related Universal Credit (UC-H). There is much to be welcomed in the Green Paper overhauling, as it does, a broken welfare system. However local impacts if not mitigated, could include: · Increased rent arrears among privately renting households that include disabled people; · Increased pressure on social services · Increased use of food banks · The loss of carers' allowance by some of the carers in the City caring for people no longer eligible for PIP This Council resolves to: 1. Respond to the Government's consultation by 30 June requesting: · a full impact assessment be undertaken before any changes are implemented; · increased and flexible funding from central government budgets to the NHS and local councils, such as through the Household Support Fund, so services can provide financial and wraparound support to residents who may lose access to disability benefits; · meaningful co-production with disabled people in shaping all government policy, so that policies and services are developed in a way that responds to the needs and experiences of disabled people, promoting their full participation and inclusion in society

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1032/683 tokens · 5793ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 15:39
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The motion raises concerns about proposed welfare reforms, including tighter eligibility for Personal Independence Payments and reduced health-condition-related Universal Credit. It says the changes could increase poverty, rent arrears, pressure on social services and food bank use among disabled residents and unpaid carers.

Recommendation
The Council Leader should write to the relevant Ministers asking for the changes to be paused pending a full impact assessment, questioning whether costs will be transferred to the NHS, local councils and local economies, and calling for meaningful co-production with disabled people. A report should also be submitted to Overview & Scrutiny (People) assessing the impact on disabled residents in the community.
Financial impact
The Green Paper proposes a net reduction in welfare spending of £4.8 billion per year by 2029-30.
Ward affected
city-wide
Decision maker
Brighton & Hove City Council
Date in document
23 Jun 2025

Stakeholders named

parsed
disabled residentsunpaid carerscouncil tenant households that include disabled peoplelocal economiesNHSlocal councilsfood banksMinisters

Next steps

parsed
  • The Council Leader writes to the Ministers concerned.
  • A report is submitted to Overview & Scrutiny (People) assessing the impact of the proposed changes on disabled residents.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage