Decision - A23 North (Patcham) TRO approval bus and cycle lane

Brighton and Hove Cabinet Member for Transport & City Infrastructure Decided 29 Oct 2025 approved GET /api/coverage

Decision maker

Cabinet Member for Transport & City Infrastructure

Report author

—

Published

29 Oct 2025

Reference

7525

As published

the council's own words, unedited

To approve three Traffic Regulation Orders t be sealed following consultation and the project proceed to procurement and constriction stage.

1) That the Cabinet Member for Transport and City Infrastructure approves that the three Traffic Regulation Orders (TRO – 7a- 2025, TRO – 7b- 2025 & TRO -7c- 2025) be sealed, and that the project proceeds to the construction phase.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 2146/716 tokens · 6246ms · parsed 8 Sep 2026 11:41

Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The consultation received 496 valid responses, while the three Traffic Regulation Orders received 70 comments. Concerns focused on the shared bus and cycle lane, turning movements, traffic access, funding priorities and cyclist safety, while the officer responses stated that the scheme would maintain access, improve bus reliability and comply with cycling design standards.

Recommendation

No formal recommendation is stated; the officer responses support proceeding with the proposed A23 North (Patcham) changes.

Financial impact

No specific amount stated; the scheme is funded through the Bus Service Improvement Plan (BSIP).

Ward affected

Patcham

Stakeholders named

parsed

Brighton & Hove Busescycling stakeholdersward councillorsresidentsbus userscyclistsmotorists

Next steps

parsed

Use the consultation and Traffic Regulation Order comments to inform consideration of the proposed A23 North (Patcham) changes.
Continue with separately planned area-specific resurfacing works to address potholes and surface quality at key locations along the route.

Precedents

not built

"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.