Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Burger King Licensing Panel (Licensing Act 2003 Functions)

Brighton and Hove Licensing Panel (Licensing Act 2003 Functions) Decided 2 Jun 2025 for determination GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Licensing Panel (Licensing Act 2003 Functions)
Report author
Charles Boufrahi
Published
11 Jun 2025
Reference
7447

As published

the council's own words, unedited

Application for a New Premises Licence Under the Licensing Act 2003

RE: Licensing Act 2003 – Licensing Panel Hearing Notification of the Determination of Panel. Licensing panel hearing held virtually via Teams on Monday 2 nd June 2025 in respect of the application for a new premises licence for Burger King, Goldstone Retail Park, Newtown Road, Hove BN3 7PN. The panel has read the report including the relevant representations and has had regard to the Statement of Licensing Policy (SoLP) and the statutory guidance and has listened carefully to all the submissions made today. This is an application for a new premises licence. The application is for a 'Late-Night Refreshment' licence every day from 23:00 to 05:00 hours with potentially 24-hour opening hours. The premises are not within the Cumulative Impact Zone (CIZ) or Special Stress Area (SSA). The Matrix indicates yes for a 'Late-Night Refreshment' licence outside of these areas until Midnight, but each case must be considered on its individual merits. 28 representations were received. They were received from local residents, Residents Association, 3 local Councillors and the Licensing Authority, on the grounds of Prevention of Public Nuisance and the Prevention of Crime & Disorder. A set of conditions have been agreed between the police and the applicant and environmental protection. These include that the premises will operate via a drive-thru facility from 23:00 hours and conditions concerning litter, noise, odour and fumes. The main concerns expressed by the Councillor and residents both in writing and at the hearing were the following: Residential area, many properties impacted now and would be more in the future Ongoing disturbance throughout the night by cars and delivery vehicles Already issues of anti-social behaviour and noise in the area and this will increase if allowed to operate all night and the sound travels due to echo effect Air pollution and smell of the premises which would continue all night Issues with litter Conditions would not be able to deal with the issues adequately The applicant's solicitor stated that they did recognise the concerns and wanted to address them. He made the following points: It was a private car park that would restrict vehicles to 10 minutes Conditions agreed to limit any noise disturbances and dialogue with residents Regular litter patrols Not previously aware of any issues with odour or fumes and don't believe there are any but would liaise with environmental protection. They were a local independent operator that could operate this licence without issue They wanted to have both delivery drivers and members of the public Would be willing to have mobile support security They were an exception to the Matrix due to the exceptional safeguards and conditions proposed The panel has considered this application on its merits. It has taken into full consideration all the points made at the hearing. The panel considers that it has been established by the residents that there are already issues of noise and anti-social behaviour in this immediate area emanating from activity in the retail park. It also considers that there does appear to be an issue with odour emanating from the premises currently. Extending the hours of operation after 23:00 hours all through the night is only likely to exacerbate the problems residents already face. There will be vehicle activity at the premises during the night with associated noise and potential anti-social behaviour. The panel was not convinced by the applicant's responses that conditions would be effective in dealing with preventing public nuisance during this extended noise sensitive time. Furthermore, the panel did not consider that exceptional circumstances to depart from the Matrix had been shown and considered that any extension of the operation beyond 23:00 hours was likely to undermine the licensing objectives of prevention of public nuisance and prevention of crime and disorder. The application is therefore refused. The minutes of the panel will be available on the Council's website under the rubric 'Council and Democracy'.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 7249/1667 tokens · 9209ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 15:39
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The Panel was asked to determine Leon Kennedy Ltd’s application for a new premises licence for Burger King at Goldstone Retail Park, Hove. The application proposed 24-hour opening and late-night refreshment every day from 23:00 to 05:00, with 28 representations raising concerns about crime, disorder and public nuisance.

Recommendation
That the Panel determine an application for a New Premises Licence under the Licensing Act 2003 for Burger King.
Financial impact
Licensing fees are payable to the licensing authority, with centrally set fees intended to recover administration, inspection and enforcement costs; no specific amount is stated.
Ward affected
Goldsmid
Decision maker
Licensing Panel
Date in document
2 Jun 2025

Stakeholders named

parsed
Leon Kennedy Ltdlocal residentsResidents Associationlocal CouncillorsSussex PoliceLicensing AuthorityEnvironmental Protection

Next steps

parsed
  • The Licensing Panel will determine the application for a new premises licence.
  • The Panel will consider the 28 representations and the proposed conditions agreed with Sussex Police and Environmental Protection.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage