Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Loro's Cafe Licensing Panel (Licensing Act 2003 Functions)

Brighton and Hove Licensing Panel (Licensing Act 2003 Functions) Decided 4 Aug 2025 for determination GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Licensing Panel (Licensing Act 2003 Functions)
Report author
Corinne Hardcastle
Published
13 Aug 2025
Reference
7491

As published

the council's own words, unedited

Application for a New Premises Licence under the Licensing Act 2003

RE: Licensing Act 2003 – Licensing Panel Hearing Notification of the Determination of Panel. Licensing panel hearing held virtually via Teams on Monday 4th August 2025 in respect of the application for a new premises licence for premises known as Loro's Cafe, 66 Lewes Road, Brighton, BN2 3HZ The Panel has read all the papers and has listened to the submissions made at the hearing. It has had regard to the statutory guidance and the Statement of Licensing Policy. This is an application for a new premises licence for a cafe to sell alcohol on and off the premises every day from 11:00 to 23:00. The premises falls within the Special Stress Area (SSA) which, as detailed in the statement of licensing policy, is deemed an area of special concern in terms of the relatively high levels of crime and disorder and public nuisance experienced within it. The Matrix policy approach in the policy indicates cafes to 22:00 hours and a 'no' for off-licences within the SSA. 2 representations were received from a local resident and the Licensing Authority with concerns relating to Prevention of Public Nuisance and Prevention of Crime and Disorder. The applicants have agreed a set of conditions with Sussex Police who withdrew their representation as a result. These are detailed in the papers and include cafe conditions, no vertical drinking and that off sales are only permitted with a substantial food order over the telephone or online. The panel heard from the applicant's representative about the measures he intended to take, the experience of the applicant and the nature of their business. There would be a full food offer and this was a small food led premises. They required to 23:00 hours to make the business viable. It was a low-risk premises and with all the measures and conditions in place they could operate safety until 23:00 hours. The outside terrace was part of their demise and so did not require a pavement licence. They would only use toughened glass in that area. They had suggested a full range of conditions in their operating schedule but where these were worded differently, the police conditions would take precedence. They had included a detailed dispersal policy which was in the papers. Substantial weight should be attached to the police representation withdrawal. Environmental Protection were happy so long as all the public nuisance conditions were attached. They had reached out to the local resident, but he had not replied. A visit was made to assess the noise complaint regarding the flue and it was inaudible and there was no smell. It was a new system with relevant planning permission. The panel was able to question the applicant about all aspects of the proposed operation and intentions. He would be willing to close the outside terrace area by 22:00 hours. The local resident attended the panel later during the hearing and expressed his concerns regarding the noise from the extractor fan unit which he could hear clearly in his house. It was explained to him that he should address these concerns to the planning enforcement officers, details of which were on the Council's website. This panel was largely concerned with the sale of alcohol application. The panel has considered this application on its individual merits and in terms of the policy and the concerns raised by those making representations. It is a relatively modest application with comprehensive conditions and measures proposed which have met the requirements of Sussex Police. As such the panel does not consider that it will add to problems in the area and considers that it is appropriate to accept a minor departure from the Matrix approach in relation to cafes and off sales. There are tailored conditions attached which limit off-sales and the requirements of the police have been met. There are also detailed conditions relating to the prevention of public nuisance and dispersal which the panel consider will promote the licensing objective of the prevention of public nuisance. The panel therefore grant the application with all the police conditions and those from the operating schedule including the dispersal policy. The panel considers it is appropriate for the prevention of public nuisance to attach a further condition which was agreed by the applicant regarding the terrace area as follows: The outside terrace area will be cleared of customers and closed by 22:00 hours every day.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 3438/1226 tokens · 10918ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 15:39
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

Representations were made against a new premises licence for Loro's Café at 66 Lewes Road, seeking alcohol sales from 11:00 to 23:00 daily. Concerns focused on late-night noise, existing extractor-fan noise, public nuisance, and the premises being in the Special Stress Area; Sussex Police later confirmed that agreed conditions had resolved its concerns.

Recommendation
No formal final recommendation is stated. The Licensing Team raised concerns about granting the application as submitted, while Sussex Police agreed conditions and restricted off-sales.
Financial impact
None stated
Date in document
11 Jul 2025

Stakeholders named

parsed
Local residentsFlorenc GjonaSussex PoliceBrighton & Hove City Council Licensing TeamBrighton & Hove City CouncilGT Licensing Consultants

Next steps

parsed
  • The premises licence application is to be considered by the licensing authority.
  • Any licence granted would be subject to the agreed Sussex Police conditions, including restrictions on off-sales and alcohol being ancillary to food and non-alcoholic beverages.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage