Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Gaza and Council Financial Exposure

Brighton and Hove Council Decided 13 Oct 2025 approved GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Council
Report author
—
Published
14 Oct 2025
Reference
7513

As published

the council's own words, unedited

Notice of Motion This Council noted: 1) The welcome news that a peace plan has been agreed in the Middle East ensuring the release of all remaining hostages and for life-saving aid to reach Gaza. 2) The widespread view, including of the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) 1 on 31/08/25 and a UN Independent Commission 2 on 16/09/25, that the Israeli Government has been committing genocide in Gaza; 3) That recent legal analysis has raised concerns that third-party states, including the UK, must ensure their activities do not contribute to violations of international law; 4) That this analysis has further suggested these responsibilities apply to the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) and other local government activities under domestic law; 3 5) The recent letter from our Council Leader to the Chair of the ESCC Pension Committee requesting an update further to report A/HRC/37/39 of the UN Human Rights Council and East Sussex Pension Fund (ESPF) exposure; This council therefore resolved to: 1) Request officers to bring a report to Cabinet detailing any exposure of ESPF, of our treasury management and of our freehold landholdings to 'involved companies 3 '; 2) Notify other local authorities who may have exposure via the East Sussex Pension Fund of the letter from the Leader of the Council and request that they seek the same information

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1354/1521 tokens · 11649ms · parsed 8 Sep 2026 11:42
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The motion raises concerns about whether the East Sussex Pension Fund, the council’s treasury management and its freehold landholdings may be exposed to companies involved in alleged violations of international law in Gaza. It asks for a report on any such exposure and for the council to write to the Secretary of State and notify other affected local authorities.

Recommendation
Request officers to bring a report to Cabinet detailing any exposure of the East Sussex Pension Fund, treasury management and freehold landholdings to ‘involved companies’; notify other local authorities that may have exposure via the East Sussex Pension Fund; and, in the original motion, request the Council Leader to write to the Secretary of State for MHCLG supporting divestment of Local Government Pension Scheme investments from ‘involved companies’.
Financial impact
None stated
Ward affected
city-wide
Decision maker
Brighton & Hove City Council
Date in document
13 Oct 2025

Stakeholders named

parsed
Brighton & Hove City CouncilEast Sussex Pension Fundother local authorities with exposure via the East Sussex Pension FundLocal Government Pension Schemethe Council Leaderthe Secretary of State for MHCLG

Next steps

parsed
  • Officers are to bring a report to Cabinet on any exposure of the East Sussex Pension Fund, treasury management and freehold landholdings to ‘involved companies’.
  • The Council Leader is to write to the Secretary of State for MHCLG, if the original recommendation is carried.
  • Other local authorities that may have exposure via the East Sussex Pension Fund are to be notified and asked to seek the same information.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage