Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Partial Review of Polling District and Polling Places 2025

Brighton and Hove Council Decided 13 Oct 2025 approved GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Council
Report author
Michael Appleford
Published
14 Oct 2025
Reference
7510

As published

the council's own words, unedited

1) That the Council agreed the revised polling district and polling place schemes outlined in Appendix 3 2) That the Council delegated authority to the Director Governance and Law to take all measures as are necessary or incidental, as required by law, to implement the changes indicated in para 2.1. 3) That the Council delegated authority to the Returning Officer to designate alternative polling places, in the event of any polling place being unavailable, at any poll taking place prior to the next review of polling places, subject to consultation with Group Leaders and respective ward Councillors.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1690/1953 tokens · 14030ms · parsed 8 Sep 2026 11:42
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The appendix sets out the new polling districts, polling places and electorate figures across Central Hove, Hove and Portslade, Hangleton & Knoll, Kemptown, North Portslade, Whitehawk & Marina, and Woodingdean. It identifies the venues to be used as polling places for each polling district.

Financial impact
none stated
Ward affected
city-wide

Stakeholders named

parsed
voterspolling district residentspolling place venue operators

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage