Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Wilding Waterhall - Access and LNR Declaration

Brighton and Hove Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committee Decided 15 Mar 2022 approved GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committee
Report author
David Larkin
Published
17 Mar 2022
Reference
6571

As published

the council's own words, unedited

To consider access arrangements at Waterhall, what restrictions should be on dogs and whether the council should seek to dedicate the site as open access land and as a Local Nature Reserve

1) That Committee agrees that the Wilding Waterhall project area ("the Wilding Waterhall Project Area") should consist of the ex-golf course land and the adjoining land being managed for wildlife under the councils Higher Level Stewardship Agreement, as shown on Appendix 1. 2) That Committee agrees that the Wilding Waterhall Project Area should be dedicated as access land and delegates authority to the Executive Director Economy, Environment & Culture to take all steps in relation thereto 3) That a further report be brough to this committee if in the view of the Waterhall Management Advisory Group ongoing monitoring is showing that the agreed public access is having an unacceptable impact on the site's biodiversity 4) That the Committee delegates authority to the Executive Director Economy, Environment & Culture to take the steps necessary to include the Wilding Waterhall Project Area within the council's dog control zone 5) That Committee agrees that the Wilding Waterhall Project Area should be declared as a Local Nature Reserve and delegates authority to the Executive Director Economy, Environment & Culture to take all steps in relation thereto.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 904/647 tokens · 6099ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 11:45
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The Conservative Group proposed deleting the recommendation to dedicate the Wilding Waterhall Project Area as access land. If carried, the revised recommendations would define the project area, provide for further reporting if public access harms biodiversity, extend the council’s dog control zone to the area, and declare it a Local Nature Reserve.

Recommendation
Delete recommendation 2.2 concerning dedication of the Wilding Waterhall Project Area as access land and replace the recommendations with provisions defining the project area, monitoring public access impacts, including the area in the council’s dog control zone, and declaring it a Local Nature Reserve.
Financial impact
none stated
Decision maker
Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committee
Date in document
15 Mar 2022

Stakeholders named

parsed
Waterhall Management Advisory Grouplocal wildlife and biodiversity interestspublic users of the Wilding Waterhall Project Area

Next steps

parsed
  • The committee was to consider the proposed amendment.
  • If the revised recommendations were carried, officers would take the necessary steps to include the project area in the council’s dog control zone and declare it a Local Nature Reserve.
  • A further report would be brought to the committee if monitoring identified an unacceptable impact of public access on biodiversity.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage