Decision - Internal Audit and Counter Fraud Quarter 2 Progress Report 2021/22

Brighton and Hove Audit & Standards Committee Decided 25 Jan 2022 approved GET /api/coverage

Decision maker

Audit & Standards Committee

Report author

Mark Dallen

Published

26 Jan 2022

Reference

6509

As published

the council's own words, unedited

The purpose of this report is to provide Members with an update on all internal audit and counter fraud activity completed during quarter 2 (2021/22), including a summary of all key audit findings. The report also includes an update on the performance of the Internal Audit service during the period.

1) That the Committee note the report and consider any further action required in response to the issues raised.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1507/609 tokens · 7223ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 11:43

Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The report updates the Committee on internal audit and counter fraud work completed during quarter 2 of 2021/22, including audit findings and service performance. The Committee was asked to note the report and consider whether any further action was needed.

Recommendation

That the Committee note the report and consider any further action required in response to the issues raised.

Financial impact

The revised Internal Audit and Corporate Fraud Plan 2021/22 is expected to be delivered within existing budgetary resources; no specific amount is stated.

Ward affected

city-wide

Decision maker

Audit & Standards Committee

Date in document

25 Jan 2022

Stakeholders named

parsed

Brighton & Hove City CouncilAudit & Standards CommitteeInternal Audit service

Next steps

parsed

The Committee should note the report.
The Committee should consider any further action required in response to the issues raised.
The revised Internal Audit and Corporate Fraud Plan 2021/22 is expected to be delivered within existing budgetary resources.

Precedents

not built

"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.