Decision - SACRE Annual Report

Brighton and Hove Children, Young People & Skills Committee Decided 13 Jun 2022 approved GET /api/coverage

Decision maker

Children, Young People & Skills Committee

Report author

Ashley Seymour-Williams

Published

13 Jun 2022

Reference

6607

As published

the council's own words, unedited

RESOLVED : That the Committee – (i) Noted the SACRE report; (ii) Continued to support the profile of the teaching of RE in Brighton & Hove schools through cross party attendance at the meetings.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 2184/1403 tokens · 8651ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 11:52

Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The report outlines the work of the Standing Advisory Council for Religious Education (SACRE) from September 2021 to March 2022, including its support for religious education, faith representation and school networks. The Committee was asked to note the report and continue supporting the profile of religious education in Brighton & Hove schools through cross-party attendance at meetings.

Recommendation

That the Committee notes the SACRE report and continues to support the profile of the teaching of religious education in Brighton & Hove schools through cross-party attendance at meetings.

Financial impact

SACRE has an annual budget of £0.008m (£8,000); there are no further financial implications of the report.

Ward affected

city-wide

Decision maker

Children, Young People and Skills Committee

Date in document

13 Jun 2022

Stakeholders named

parsed

Brighton & Hove City CouncilSACRElocal faith communitiesBrighton & Hove schoolschildren and young peopleteachersthe two diocesesteaching unions

Next steps

parsed

The Committee should note the SACRE report.
The Committee should continue supporting the profile of religious education in Brighton & Hove schools through cross-party attendance at SACRE meetings.

Precedents

not built

"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.