Decision - Application for a Definitive Map Modification Order, Benfield Valley, Hove

Brighton and Hove Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committee Decided 20 Sep 2022 approved GET /api/coverage

Decision maker

Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committee

Report author

Hilary Woodward

Published

26 Sep 2022

Reference

6707

As published

the council's own words, unedited

ETS Committee is being asked to determine whether two claimed footpaths at Benfield Valley should be added to the Council's Definitive Map as public rights of way.

1) That Committee agrees to make an Order on the basis that the evidence referred to in this report shows that the Claimed Routes, as defined in the report, can at least be reasonably alleged to subsist in accordance with Section 53(3)(c) ( i ) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 706/181 tokens · 2908ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 11:53

Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The supplied document contains only page numbers from 107 to 156 and no substantive council report or decision information. It is therefore not possible to identify the matter, decision, recommendation, or affected ward.

Financial impact

none stated

Precedents

not built

"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.