Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - A259: Walking, Cycling and Accessibility improvements

Brighton and Hove Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committee Decided 20 Sep 2022 approved GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committee
Report author
James Hammond
Published
26 Sep 2022
Reference
6712

As published

the council's own words, unedited

This report is to present to results of a Traffic Regulations Order public consultation for the proposed scheme and makes a recommendation to the committee.

1) That Committee agrees Officers have suitably addressed the objections received as part of the consultation. 2) That Committee authorises officers to commence the construction phase and to procure the Works Contract under the authority of the Executive Director.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1263/334 tokens · 3679ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 11:54
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The scheme proposes changing parking allocations along the A259, resulting in the loss of 55 spaces and the gain of 59 spaces. The changes include 27 additional disabled bays, 13 loading bays, and adjustments to pay-and-display and permit-holder bays.

Recommendation
Implement the proposed parking bay alterations for the A259 Walking, Cycling and Accessibility Scheme.
Financial impact
Maximum potential loss of parking income is £20,773, with estimated loss of income of £10,875.

Stakeholders named

parsed
Disabled parking usersPermit holders in Zones N and WPay-and-display parking usersLoading and servicing vehicles

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage