Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Adoption of the Brighton & Hove City Plan Part 2

Brighton and Hove Tourism, Equalities, Communities & Culture Committee Decided 15 Sep 2022 approved GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Tourism, Equalities, Communities & Culture Committee
Report author
Helen Gregory
Published
15 Sep 2022
Reference
6704

As published

the council's own words, unedited

To recommend adoption of the Brighton & Hove City Plan Part 2 (including updated Policies Map) following the receipt of the Inspector's Report that concluded that subject to modifications the City Plan Part 2 is sound. Once adopted, the City Plan Part 2 will replace a retained policies in the 2005 Brighton & Hove Local Plan.

RESOLVED: That the Tourism, Equalities, Communities & Culture Committee recommend to Full Council: 1. To agree to adopt and publish the Proposed Submission Brighton & Hove City Plan Part Two, as amended to include all the main modifications required by the CPP2 Examining Inspector to make the plan sound, in accordance with Section 23 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012. This includes changes required to the adopted Policies Map, together with other additional (minor) modifications already noted by the 16 March 2022 Tourism, Economy, Culture & Communities Committee (including any consequential and other appropriate alterations for the purposes of clarification, improved accuracy of meaning or typographical corrections, being necessary). 2. To agree amendments needed for planning application validation requirements. 3. To note that on adoption of the City Plan Part Two the policies in the retained 2005 Brighton & Hove Local Plan will be superseded. These superseded policies are listed in Appendix 5 of the City Plan Part Two.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1833/382 tokens · 5154ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 11:54
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The Inspector recommended main modifications to planning policies and site allocations to improve clarity, align them with national planning policy and reflect changes to planning legislation. The modifications cover housing, retail, public houses, design, heritage, nature conservation, energy, sustainable drainage and specific housing sites.

Recommendation
To adopt the Inspector’s recommended main modifications to the planning policies and site allocations described in the schedule.
Financial impact
none stated
Ward affected
city-wide

Stakeholders named

parsed
The councilApplicants and developersResidents and local communitiesLandownersBusinesses and public house operatorsHeritage and nature conservation interests

Next steps

parsed
  • Consider the Inspector’s Schedule of Main Modifications as part of the committee report and decision-making process.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage