Decision - COVID-19 Additional Relief Fund (CARF) update
Decision maker
Policy & Resources Committee
Report author
Paul Ross-Dale
Published
29 Jul 2022
Reference
6682
As published
the council's own words, uneditedAn update on progress distributing CARF awards, and a proposed change to the allocation methodology, due to low take up.
RESOLVED: That the Policy & Resources Committee approved the revised scheme criteria described in Section 4.
Parsed from the document
gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 4373/979 tokens · 9145ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 11:52
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model
It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the
rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.
The report proposed replacing the existing Covid Additional Relief Fund scheme with a simpler methodology so that more of the £6.912 million allocation reaches eligible local businesses. Under the revised scheme, businesses would generally be identified and awarded relief without applying or proving material loss, with allocations completed by 30 September 2022.
Recommendation
That the Policy & Resources Committee approves the revised scheme criteria described in Section 4.
Financial impact
£6.912 million allocated for the Brighton and Hove area, with £5.698 million remaining to be distributed.
Ward affected
city-wide
Decision maker
Policy and Resources Committee
Date in document
29 Jul 2022
Stakeholders named
parsed
local businessesbusiness representative organisationsBrighton & Hove City Councilcentral government
Next steps
parsed- Replace the existing scheme with the revised methodology from 30 July 2022.
- Identify eligible ratepayers by SIC code and allocate relief using the revised percentages.
- Calibrate the final relief percentages after 30 July and make any necessary adjustments.
- Check whether existing recipients would receive more under the new criteria and top up their relief where appropriate.
- Complete all relief allocations by 30 September 2022.
Precedents
not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built
Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision
text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions
list is the way through.