Decision - Timetable of Meetings for 2026/27

Brighton and Hove Council Decided 29 Jan 2026 for determination GET /api/coverage

Decision maker

Council

Report author

Anthony Soyinka

Published

11 Feb 2026

Reference

7574

As published

the council's own words, unedited

1) That the proposed timetable of meetings for the 2026/27 municipal year be agreed; subject to any necessary amendments following changes to the Constitution and/or committees' requirements.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 2287/714 tokens · 6980ms · parsed 8 Sep 2026 11:39

Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The report proposed the timetable of meetings for the 2026/27 municipal year, covering Council, Cabinet, committees, scrutiny bodies, forums and partnerships. The timetable was recommended for agreement, subject to any necessary amendments arising from constitutional or committee requirements.

Outcome

approved

Recommendation

That the proposed timetable of meetings for the 2026/27 municipal year be agreed, subject to any necessary amendments following changes to the Constitution and/or committees’ requirements.

Financial impact

There are no additional financial implications; meeting costs will be met from existing budgets.

Ward affected

city-wide

Decision maker

Brighton & Hove City Council

Date in document

29 Jan 2026

Stakeholders named

parsed

Membersmembers of the publicLead MembersCorporate Directorsappropriate officersFull CouncilCabinetOverview & Scrutiny CommitteesRegulatory CommitteesGreater Brighton Economic BoardHealth & Wellbeing Board

Next steps

parsed

Implement the proposed 2026/27 meetings timetable.
Make any necessary amendments following changes to the Constitution or committees’ requirements.
Confirm the start times for Cabinet and Full Council meetings after consultation concludes.
Alter meeting dates or arrange additional meetings if required.

Precedents

not built

"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.