Decision - Annual Youth Justice Plan 25/26

Brighton and Hove Council Decided 29 Jan 2026 for determination GET /api/coverage

Decision maker

Council

Report author

Tania Riedel

Published

11 Feb 2026

Reference

7570

As published

the council's own words, unedited

Local authority partnerships have a statutory duty to submit a youth justice plan relating to the provision of youth justice services. The attached plan has been agreed in consultation with partner agencies. It sets out how youth justice services are provided and funded, how it will operate and the functions carried out.

1) Full Council noted the city's Youth Justice Plan and supports the activity detailed therein.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 2092/1353 tokens · 11554ms · parsed 8 Sep 2026 11:39

Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The report asks Full Council to note and support Brighton and Hove’s Youth Justice Plan for 2025/26. The plan sets out how youth justice services will prevent offending, reduce reoffending and support positive outcomes for young people through partnership working.

Recommendation

Full Council notes the city’s Youth Justice Plan and supports the activity detailed therein.

Financial impact

None stated; the report says there are no financial implications because of the recommendations.

Ward affected

city-wide

Decision maker

Full Council

Date in document

29 Jan 2026

Stakeholders named

parsed

children and young peoplefamilies and carersYouth Justice ServicesBrighton and Hove Adolescent Partnership BoardBrighton & Hove City CouncilSussex Policethe National Probation ServiceNHS Sussexvoluntary sector representativesschool representatives

Next steps

parsed

Full Council to note the Youth Justice Plan and support the activity detailed in it.
Continue delivering the 2025/26 Youth Justice Plan through the partnership arrangements.
Implement the plan and meet the statutory requirement to provide and fund youth justice services.

Precedents

not built

"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.