Decision - Pedestrian Crossing Priority Programme
Decision maker
Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committee
Report author
Jazmine Hayes
Published
17 Nov 2022
Reference
6773
As published
the council's own words, uneditedA yearly update on the Pedestrian Crossing Priority Programme, presenting the current priority list for approval and providing an update on current sites in progress.
1) That Committee agrees the new Pedestrian Crossing Priority Programme listed in Appendix 2. 2) That Committee agrees that officers can commence the identified locations in the Pedestrian Crossing Priority Programme top 10 priority list identified at table 1 in this report.
Parsed from the document
gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1544/487 tokens · 4134ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 11:54
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model
It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the
rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.
The policy sets out an impartial process for assessing requests for pedestrian crossings. Sites must meet pre-qualification criteria before detailed assessment and prioritisation, with the crossing type determined by site conditions and identified need.
Recommendation
Apply the stated pre-qualification, detailed assessment and scoring procedures when assessing requests for pedestrian crossing facilities.
Financial impact
No specific budget amount stated; the policy notes that traffic light controlled crossings can cost up to five times the cost of a zebra or central island crossing.
Stakeholders named
parsed
PedestriansMobility-impaired peopleSchoolchildrenPublic transport usersCyclistsLocal residents
Next steps
parsed- Undertake an initial assessment of each crossing request against the pre-qualification criteria.
- Undertake a detailed assessment and prioritise sites that meet the criteria.
- Determine the type of crossing facility based on the site's characteristics and assessment.
Precedents
not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built
Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision
text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions
list is the way through.