Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Safer, Better Streets - Infrastructure Priority Framework

Brighton and Hove Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committee Decided 17 Jan 2023 approved GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committee
Report author
Tracy Beverley
Published
19 Jan 2023
Reference
6834

As published

the council's own words, unedited

This report expands on the Pedestrian Priority Methodology and broadens the assessment criteria to help assess and deliver safer and better street infrastructure. The report outlines the methodology used to assess requests for improvements and identifies the assessment criteria, process and typical outcomes.

1) That the Environment Transport & Sustainability Committee approves the Safer, Better Streets – Highway Improvement Prioritisation Framework and grants permission to commence the assessment of outstanding concerns, listed in Appendix 1. 2) That the Environment Transport & Sustainability Committee requests a review of the criteria listed to consider other metrics over and above the assessments outlined in the pre-qualification criteria outlined in Appendix 2, to ensure issues such as midnight ' joyriders' or regular non-peak time speeding are not overlooked, and report back on this review for committee approval. 3) That the Environment Transport & Sustainability Committee notes that future concerns will be assessed under this framework and priority locations will be reported every six months at Committee to enable swift action if any new schemes highlight unintended accident spots, for example. Priority improvement measures will be recommended at Committee and implemented, subject to available funding, through the LTP's capital programme or external funding streams. 4) That the Environment Transport & Sustainability Committee agrees that in clarification of paragraph 4.5 of this report, officers will still consider requests from members of the public following petitions and deputations to committee, if committee members vote to refer said requests from petitions/deputations to the framework.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 1228/652 tokens · 5752ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 11:59
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The committee was asked to approve the Safer, Better Streets – Highway Improvement Prioritisation Framework and begin assessing outstanding concerns. The amended recommendations also required a review of the assessment criteria, quarterly reporting of priority locations, and consideration of public requests referred by committee members.

Recommendation
Approve the Safer, Better Streets – Highway Improvement Prioritisation Framework; begin assessing outstanding concerns; review the criteria to include additional metrics; report priority locations quarterly; implement recommended improvements subject to available funding; and consider requests from members of the public referred to the framework following petitions or deputations.
Financial impact
No specific amount stated; implementation is subject to available funding through the LTP’s capital programme or external funding streams.
Ward affected
city-wide
Decision maker
Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committee
Date in document
17 Jan 2023

Stakeholders named

parsed
Environment, Transport & Sustainability Committeemembers of the publiccommittee membersofficersLabour Group

Next steps

parsed
  • Commence assessment of the outstanding concerns listed in Appendix 1.
  • Review the assessment criteria and report back to the committee for approval.
  • Report priority locations quarterly at committee.
  • Recommend and implement priority improvement measures subject to available funding.
  • Consider public requests referred to the framework following petitions or deputations where committee members vote to do so.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage