Decision - Formal approval of the Annual Governance Statement 2022-2023
Decision maker
Audit & Standards Committee
Report author
Rima Desai
Published
12 Jul 2023
Reference
6963
As published
the council's own words, unedited1) That Audit & Standards Committee formally approve the Annual Governance Statement 2022-2023 at Appendix 1 so that the AGS may be signed by the City Council's Leader and Chief Executive before publication alongside the City Council's Statement of Accounts.
Parsed from the document
gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 8932/2491 tokens · 15696ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 12:02
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model
It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the
rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.
The Annual Governance Statement reviews Brighton & Hove City Council’s governance, risk management and internal control arrangements for 2022/23. Internal Audit gave reasonable assurance, while identifying areas for continued improvement and actions to strengthen governance during 2023/24.
Outcome
approved
Recommendation
Approve the Annual Governance Statement for 2022/23 and continue monitoring the implementation of the governance improvement actions.
Financial impact
None stated
Ward affected
city-wide
Decision maker
Audit & Standards Committee
Date in document
23 May 2023
Stakeholders named
parsed
Brighton & Hove City CouncilAudit & Standards CommitteeInternal AuditExternal AuditExecutive Leadership TeamDirectorate Management Teamsresidentsbusinessesgovernmentlocal communityadult social care service userschildren and familiescouncil employees
Next steps
parsed- Continue monitoring implementation of the governance improvement actions through the stated monitoring processes.
- Report the Council’s progress in the next Annual Governance Statement.
- Continue regular review and reporting of strategic and directorate risks to the relevant committees and management teams.
Precedents
not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built
Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision
text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions
list is the way through.