Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - A259 Hove to Portslade Active Travel Scheme Consultation

Brighton and Hove Cabinet Decided 13 Nov 2025 · effective 22 Nov 2025 approved Key decision GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Cabinet
Report author
Russell McMillan
Published
14 Nov 2025
Reference
7529

As published

the council's own words, unedited

This report will summarise the results of the public consultation for the A259 Hove to Portslade Active Travel Scheme and include recommendations for the next steps of the project.

1) That Cabinet notes the outcome of the most recent public consultation and stakeholder engagement as set out in Appendix 1 of this report. 2) That Cabinet approves the amendments to the A259 Hove to Portslade Active Travel Scheme designs as outlined in the report at paragraph 5.4, Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, following consideration of the public consultation and stakeholder engagement responses. 3) That Cabinet authorises that all Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs) required for the A259 Hove to Portslade Active Travel Scheme be advertised in accordance with the standard procedure. If the TRO consultation responses exceed the threshold as outlined in the Part 2F - Scheme of Delegation to Officers, the TROs will be reported back to this Cabinet next year to agree the way forward. 4) That Cabinet delegates to the Corporate Director for City Operations, the decision to procure and award a call-off contract, within the budget outlined in Section 6 of this report, under the Council's existing Highways Services Framework for the construction of the A259 Hove to Portslade Active Travel Scheme. 5) That Cabinet requests officers to pursue external funding to extend the A259 Hove to Portslade Active Travel Scheme east towards Brighton in response to feedback received. Any designs would be subject to the usual approval and consultation processes.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 17793/1830 tokens · 14150ms · parsed 8 Sep 2026 11:43
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The report presents feedback from a public consultation on proposals to improve active travel facilities along the A259 between Hove and Portslade. Most respondents supported the proposed cycle routes, crossings and wider pavements, and the designs were amended in response to concerns about crossings, parking, bus stops, safety and traffic.

Financial impact
£4.3 million awarded by Active Travel England and £2.7 million allocated from the council’s Local Transport Plan funding over three years.

Stakeholders named

parsed
Brighton & Hove City residentsHove and Portslade residents and businessesCyclists and cycling stakeholder groupsPedestriansDisabled people and disability stakeholder organisationsBus operators and bus stakeholder groupsWest Sussex residents and stakeholdersLocal resident groupsAdur & Worthing District CouncilWest Sussex County Council

Next steps

parsed
  • Incorporate the consultation-informed design changes into the proposals.
  • Widen the buffer separator next to parking as much as possible.
  • Add safety measures on shared-use sections and review toucan crossing designs.
  • Review bus stop positioning to maintain traffic flow.
  • Work with West Sussex County Council on making the route two-way sooner and continuing the separated cycle lane towards Shoreham-by-Sea.
  • Consider additional parking mitigation and green spaces or planting where possible.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage