Civic Signal GUEST
ROWS
API PATHS
Docs Sign in
Browsing as a guest. A free key raises the rate limit.

Decision - Brighton Marina Neighbourhood Plan – Submission for Examination

Brighton and Hove Culture, Heritage, Sport, Tourism & Economic Development Committee Decided 18 Apr 2024 for determination GET /api/coverage
Decision maker
Culture, Heritage, Sport, Tourism & Economic Development Committee
Report author
Sandra Rogers, Carly Dockerill
Published
18 Apr 2024
Reference
7212

As published

the council's own words, unedited

Brighton Marina Neighbourhood Forum has submitted its draft Neighbourhood Plan to the Council. The Council must now take responsibility for progressing the Plan through the subsequent stages of the neighbourhood plan process. This report therefore seeks Committee agreement for officers to proceed with the appointment of an examiner and the submission of the Draft Neighbourhood Plan for examination.

RESOLVED: That Committee: 1. Agreed that officers proceed with the appointment of a suitably qualified and experienced independent person to undertake examination of the Brighton Marina Neighbourhood Plan; 2. Agreed to submit the Draft Neighbourhood Plan and its supporting documents for examination, together with all representations received in response to the Regulation 16 publication of the Draft Plan; and 3. Endorsed and agreed to submit the officer comments on the Draft Neighbourhood Plan set in Appendix 1 as the Council's Regulation 16 response for consideration at the examination.

Parsed from the document

gpt-5.6-luna-2026-07-09 · 4087/1071 tokens · 9714ms · parsed 9 Sep 2026 15:24
Everything below was read out of a PDF by a model It is useful and it is not authoritative. The document it came from is linked in the rail, and where the two disagree the document is right.

The report sets out Brighton & Hove City Council officers’ comments and suggested amendments to the Regulation 16 submission version of the Brighton Marina Neighbourhood Plan. The comments cover design, public spaces, connectivity, housing, environmental protection, climate resilience, commercial uses, community facilities and document accessibility.

Recommendation
That the examiner and Neighbourhood Forum consider the suggested amendments, including stronger design and connectivity requirements, references to relevant Brighton & Hove City Council policies and strategies, improved protection for biodiversity and heritage assets, climate adaptation measures, clearer policy wording, and accessibility improvements.
Financial impact
none stated
Decision maker
Brighton & Hove City Council officers

Stakeholders named

parsed
Brighton & Hove City CouncilBrighton Marina Neighbourhood Forumlocal residentsboat ownersvisitorsplanning applicantsthe examiner

Next steps

parsed
  • Submit the officer comments and recommended amendments for consideration during examination of the Brighton Marina Neighbourhood Plan.
  • Consider revising the plan’s policies and supporting text in response to the comments.
  • Add paragraph numbers, policy list lettering, a terminology glossary and improved colour contrast.
  • Update references to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant Brighton & Hove City Council policies, strategies and designations.

Precedents

not built
"Decided elsewhere" is not built Finding the same decision in other councils needs semantic matching over decision text, which is part of the search rewrite. Until then, the council's own decisions list is the way through.
Documents
Who voted
Not extracted
Recorded votes are published in the minutes but we do not yet parse them into a direction per councillor. This page will not guess at one.
Watch this
Not built
Following a decision would ask you for a channel — email or webhook — at the point of following, with no default. Neither channel exists yet.
GET /api/coverage